Natural refrigerants (CO₂, propane, isobutane)

6. 9. 2025

What are natural refrigerants?

Natural refrigerants are substances naturally occurring in nature, used in cooling and air‑conditioning systems for heat transfer. Unlike synthetic refrigerants – such as CFCs, HCFCs and HFCs – they are not artificially manufactured, but usually only purified and adapted for industrial use. The most commonly used natural refrigerants are carbon dioxide (CO₂, R‑744), propane (R‑290), isobutane (R‑600a) and ammonia (NH₃, R‑717).

Why is their importance growing?

  • Environmental properties: They have zero ozone depletion potential (ODP = 0) and a very low global warming potential (GWP).
  • Regulatory compliance: They respond to global agreements (Montreal Protocol, Kigali Amendment) that lead to the gradual phase‑out of high‑GWP refrigerants.
  • Long‑term sustainability: They are not among the so‑called forever chemicals (PFAS) that accumulate in the environment.

Natural refrigerants, however, place high demands on safety, system design and personnel qualification. Each has specific properties that must be considered when selecting.


Historical context: From synthetic refrigerants to natural alternatives

Synthetic refrigerants and their impacts

GenerationExamplesODPGWPMain risks
CFCR‑12110 600Extreme ozone damage, strong greenhouse effect
HCFCR‑220.051 810Smaller but still significant ozone impact
HFCR‑134a, R‑404A, R‑410A01 430–3 922Greenhouse effect, no ozone damage

Adoption of the Montreal Protocol (1987) and the Kigali Amendment (2016) marked a turning point: from synthetic refrigerants to environmentally friendly alternatives. The European Union emphasizes rapid decarbonization and GWP reduction under the F‑Gas regulation.


Key environmental metrics

  • ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): Ability to destroy the ozone layer (reference value 1 = R‑11). Natural refrigerants have ODP = 0.
  • GWP (Global Warming Potential): Measure of contribution to global warming (reference value 1 = CO₂). For natural refrigerants GWP ranges from 1–3 (significantly lower than HFCs).

Table: Comparison of GWP of major refrigerants

RefrigerantGWPODP
R‑744 (CO₂)10
R‑290 (propane)30
R‑600a (isobutane)30
R‑134a (HFC)1 4300
R‑404A (HFC)3 9220

Overview: Natural refrigerants – technical details, advantages and disadvantages

Carbon dioxide (CO₂, R‑744)

Properties:

  • Safety group: A1 (non‑flammable, non‑toxic)
  • Operating pressures: 30–130 bar (requires special components)
  • Critical temperature: 31 °C
  • Common applications: Supermarkets, warehouse cooling, heat pumps

Advantages:

  • Minimal climate impact (GWP = 1)
  • Non‑flammable, non‑toxic in normal concentrations
  • High volumetric refrigerating capacity (smaller piping)
  • Good efficiency in cascade and transcritical systems
  • Low cost and easy availability

Disadvantages:

  • High operating pressures (requires robust technology)
  • Higher investment costs (special compressors, exchangers)
  • Need knowledge of transcritical cycle (especially in warm climates)
  • Risk of asphyxiation in case of leak in enclosed spaces (CO₂ is heavier than air)

Safety aspects:

  • Standards and regulations: EN 378, ČSN EN 378 (design of safe systems, detection and ventilation)
  • CO₂ detectors: Mandatory in enclosed engine rooms
  • Ventilation: Necessary to prevent gas accumulation and possible asphyxiation

Propane (R‑290)

Properties:

  • Safety group: A3 (highly flammable, low toxicity)
  • Operating pressures: Comparable to HFC (8–15 bar)
  • Critical temperature: 96.7 °C
  • Common applications: Household refrigerators, small commercial display cases, heat pumps

Advantages:

  • GWP ≈ 3 (practically zero climate impact)
  • Excellent thermodynamic properties (efficiency comparable to R‑22)
  • Low operating pressures (easy integration into existing equipment)
  • Cheap, widely available

Disadvantages:

  • Highly flammable (requires strict safety measures)
  • Limit on maximum charge (150–500 g depending on equipment type and standard)
  • Requires specially trained personnel (certification per decree 194/2017 Sb.)

Safety aspects:

  • Standards: EN 378, IEC 60335‑2‑89 (charge limits, electrical equipment requirements, ventilation, protection against ignition)
  • System design: Minimize leaks (quality joints, minimal charge volume)
  • Ignition protection: All electrical parts must be explosion‑proof or safely separated
  • Ventilation: Spaces with A3 refrigerants must be well ventilated

Isobutane (R‑600a)

Properties:

  • Safety group: A3 (highly flammable)
  • Operating pressures: Lower than HFC (≈ 2–4 bar)
  • Critical temperature: 134.7 °C
  • Common applications: Household refrigerators, freezers, minibars

Advantages:

  • GWP ≈ 3, ODP = 0
  • Very high energy efficiency in small devices
  • Small required charge (typically 45–80 g)
  • Low operating pressures (smaller and quieter compressors)

Disadvantages:

  • Highly flammable (class A3)
  • Limit on maximum charge (80 g in household appliances)
  • Higher service and maintenance demands (trained staff, certification)

Safety aspects:

  • Standards: Same as R‑290 (EN 378, IEC 60335‑2‑24)
  • Equipment design: Minimize refrigerant volume, safety switches, explosion‑proof compressor motors
  • Regular leak checks and safety component inspections

Comparative table: Natural vs. synthetic refrigerants

PropertyCO₂ (R‑744)Propane (R‑290)Isobutane (R‑600a)HFC (e.g., R‑134a)
ODP0000
GWP1331 430
Safety classA1A3A3A1
FlammabilityNoYes (high)Yes (high)No
Charge limit (typ.)tens of kg150–500 g80 gkg (no limit)
Operating pressure30–130 bar8–15 bar2–4 bar7–16 bar
Energy efficiencyHighHighHighAverage
Refrigerant priceVery lowLowLowHigh

Safety classification and legislation

Refrigerant safety classification according to standard ČSN EN 378‑1

GroupFlammabilityToxicityExample refrigerant
A1NoLowCO₂, HFC
A2LLowLowR‑32, R‑1234yf
A3HighLowPropane, isobutane
B1NoHighAmmonia
B2L/B3HighHigh

Standards and restrictions:

  • EN 378 (ČSN EN 378): Safety requirements for refrigeration equipment
  • IEC 60335‑2‑89/2‑24: Charge limits, electrical safety
  • EU Regulation 517/2014 (F‑Gas): Restrictions on sale and use of HFCs, support for natural refrigerants
  • Decree No. 194/2017 Sb.: Requirements for professional competence of technicians

Challenges and technological trends

  • Personnel qualification: Working with flammable refrigerants (A3) requires special training and certification.
  • Technological innovations: New compressors, fans and heat exchangers designed for high pressures and leak minimisation.
  • Safety features: Leak detectors, automatic shut‑offs, explosion‑proof electrical components.
  • Charge limitations: Development of equipment with minimal refrigerant charge to maximise safety.

Practice and experience from the Czech industry

  • Manufacturers and distributors in the Czech Republic (e.g., Sinop CB, Embraco) already regularly implement natural refrigerants in household appliances, commercial display cases and heat pumps.
  • Testing and certification: Each unit must undergo leak, safety and performance tests.
  • Operational requirements: Regular inspections, charge records, employee training.


Other container news...

The Future of Ports: How Smart Infrastructure Is Transforming Maritime Logistics

11. 5. 2026

Smart infrastructure is fundamentally changing the face of the world’s ports and the entire maritime logistics sector. Automation, digitalization, environmental measures and the use of artificial intelligence are leading to greater efficiency, safety and sustainability. Although the implementation of these technologies brings new challenges in the field of security and requires a transformation of the workforce, ports that invest in them are strengthening their position in the global supply chain. The future of maritime logistics belongs to those who can combine innovation with a responsible approach to the environment and market needs. HZ-Containers.com follows current trends and is ready to be part of this revolution.

Container Recycling: Pathways to a Circular Economy in Shipping

10. 5. 2026

Recycling of shipping containers is an important step towards a circular economy and sustainable development in the field of shipping. Current trends and projects show that containers can find new applications in architecture, business and humanitarian aid. The transition to a circular model brings not only ecological but also economic benefits. The crises in shipping accelerate the need for innovation and efficient use of available resources. However, the challenges associated with legislation and technical limitations require systematic support from the state and the private sector. The future of container recycling is promising and can fundamentally transform not only shipping, but also the wider economic and social environment.

Strait of Hormuz Crisis: How the Middle East Escalation Paralyzed Global Container Shipping

9. 5. 2026

The current crisis in the Strait of Hormuz represents an unprecedented intervention in the global shipping container market. The closure of the strategic maritime corridor immediately triggered a domino effect that affects both prices and logistics around the world. The risk of direct attacks, container shortages and a sharp increase in fuel prices threaten the stability of supply chains and the functioning of the global economy. At the moment, it is unclear when and under what conditions the situation will return to normal. Companies and carriers must quickly find new strategies and prepare for a period of high volatility and uncertainty. HZ-Containers.com will continue to monitor developments and provide up-to-date information to its customers.

How to Choose the Right Marine Cargo Insurance for Different Types of Goods?

8. 5. 2026

Proper marine insurance takes into account the type and value of the goods, the route, the shipping conditions and specific risks. An investment in quality insurance can pay off many times over in the event of unexpected events.