Natural refrigerants (CO₂, propane, isobutane)
What are natural refrigerants?
Natural refrigerants are substances naturally occurring in nature, used in cooling and air‑conditioning systems for heat transfer. Unlike synthetic refrigerants – such as CFCs, HCFCs and HFCs – they are not artificially manufactured, but usually only purified and adapted for industrial use. The most commonly used natural refrigerants are carbon dioxide (CO₂, R‑744), propane (R‑290), isobutane (R‑600a) and ammonia (NH₃, R‑717).
Why is their importance growing?
- Environmental properties: They have zero ozone depletion potential (ODP = 0) and a very low global warming potential (GWP).
- Regulatory compliance: They respond to global agreements (Montreal Protocol, Kigali Amendment) that lead to the gradual phase‑out of high‑GWP refrigerants.
- Long‑term sustainability: They are not among the so‑called forever chemicals (PFAS) that accumulate in the environment.
Natural refrigerants, however, place high demands on safety, system design and personnel qualification. Each has specific properties that must be considered when selecting.
Historical context: From synthetic refrigerants to natural alternatives
Synthetic refrigerants and their impacts
| Generation | Examples | ODP | GWP | Main risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFC | R‑12 | 1 | 10 600 | Extreme ozone damage, strong greenhouse effect |
| HCFC | R‑22 | 0.05 | 1 810 | Smaller but still significant ozone impact |
| HFC | R‑134a, R‑404A, R‑410A | 0 | 1 430–3 922 | Greenhouse effect, no ozone damage |
Adoption of the Montreal Protocol (1987) and the Kigali Amendment (2016) marked a turning point: from synthetic refrigerants to environmentally friendly alternatives. The European Union emphasizes rapid decarbonization and GWP reduction under the F‑Gas regulation.
Key environmental metrics
- ODP (Ozone Depletion Potential): Ability to destroy the ozone layer (reference value 1 = R‑11). Natural refrigerants have ODP = 0.
- GWP (Global Warming Potential): Measure of contribution to global warming (reference value 1 = CO₂). For natural refrigerants GWP ranges from 1–3 (significantly lower than HFCs).
Table: Comparison of GWP of major refrigerants
| Refrigerant | GWP | ODP |
|---|---|---|
| R‑744 (CO₂) | 1 | 0 |
| R‑290 (propane) | 3 | 0 |
| R‑600a (isobutane) | 3 | 0 |
| R‑134a (HFC) | 1 430 | 0 |
| R‑404A (HFC) | 3 922 | 0 |
Overview: Natural refrigerants – technical details, advantages and disadvantages
Carbon dioxide (CO₂, R‑744)
Properties:
- Safety group: A1 (non‑flammable, non‑toxic)
- Operating pressures: 30–130 bar (requires special components)
- Critical temperature: 31 °C
- Common applications: Supermarkets, warehouse cooling, heat pumps
Advantages:
- Minimal climate impact (GWP = 1)
- Non‑flammable, non‑toxic in normal concentrations
- High volumetric refrigerating capacity (smaller piping)
- Good efficiency in cascade and transcritical systems
- Low cost and easy availability
Disadvantages:
- High operating pressures (requires robust technology)
- Higher investment costs (special compressors, exchangers)
- Need knowledge of transcritical cycle (especially in warm climates)
- Risk of asphyxiation in case of leak in enclosed spaces (CO₂ is heavier than air)
Safety aspects:
- Standards and regulations: EN 378, ČSN EN 378 (design of safe systems, detection and ventilation)
- CO₂ detectors: Mandatory in enclosed engine rooms
- Ventilation: Necessary to prevent gas accumulation and possible asphyxiation
Propane (R‑290)
Properties:
- Safety group: A3 (highly flammable, low toxicity)
- Operating pressures: Comparable to HFC (8–15 bar)
- Critical temperature: 96.7 °C
- Common applications: Household refrigerators, small commercial display cases, heat pumps
Advantages:
- GWP ≈ 3 (practically zero climate impact)
- Excellent thermodynamic properties (efficiency comparable to R‑22)
- Low operating pressures (easy integration into existing equipment)
- Cheap, widely available
Disadvantages:
- Highly flammable (requires strict safety measures)
- Limit on maximum charge (150–500 g depending on equipment type and standard)
- Requires specially trained personnel (certification per decree 194/2017 Sb.)
Safety aspects:
- Standards: EN 378, IEC 60335‑2‑89 (charge limits, electrical equipment requirements, ventilation, protection against ignition)
- System design: Minimize leaks (quality joints, minimal charge volume)
- Ignition protection: All electrical parts must be explosion‑proof or safely separated
- Ventilation: Spaces with A3 refrigerants must be well ventilated
Isobutane (R‑600a)
Properties:
- Safety group: A3 (highly flammable)
- Operating pressures: Lower than HFC (≈ 2–4 bar)
- Critical temperature: 134.7 °C
- Common applications: Household refrigerators, freezers, minibars
Advantages:
- GWP ≈ 3, ODP = 0
- Very high energy efficiency in small devices
- Small required charge (typically 45–80 g)
- Low operating pressures (smaller and quieter compressors)
Disadvantages:
- Highly flammable (class A3)
- Limit on maximum charge (80 g in household appliances)
- Higher service and maintenance demands (trained staff, certification)
Safety aspects:
- Standards: Same as R‑290 (EN 378, IEC 60335‑2‑24)
- Equipment design: Minimize refrigerant volume, safety switches, explosion‑proof compressor motors
- Regular leak checks and safety component inspections
Comparative table: Natural vs. synthetic refrigerants
| Property | CO₂ (R‑744) | Propane (R‑290) | Isobutane (R‑600a) | HFC (e.g., R‑134a) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ODP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GWP | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 430 |
| Safety class | A1 | A3 | A3 | A1 |
| Flammability | No | Yes (high) | Yes (high) | No |
| Charge limit (typ.) | tens of kg | 150–500 g | 80 g | kg (no limit) |
| Operating pressure | 30–130 bar | 8–15 bar | 2–4 bar | 7–16 bar |
| Energy efficiency | High | High | High | Average |
| Refrigerant price | Very low | Low | Low | High |
Safety classification and legislation
Refrigerant safety classification according to standard ČSN EN 378‑1
| Group | Flammability | Toxicity | Example refrigerant |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | No | Low | CO₂, HFC |
| A2L | Low | Low | R‑32, R‑1234yf |
| A3 | High | Low | Propane, isobutane |
| B1 | No | High | Ammonia |
| B2L/B3 | High | High | – |
Standards and restrictions:
- EN 378 (ČSN EN 378): Safety requirements for refrigeration equipment
- IEC 60335‑2‑89/2‑24: Charge limits, electrical safety
- EU Regulation 517/2014 (F‑Gas): Restrictions on sale and use of HFCs, support for natural refrigerants
- Decree No. 194/2017 Sb.: Requirements for professional competence of technicians
Challenges and technological trends
- Personnel qualification: Working with flammable refrigerants (A3) requires special training and certification.
- Technological innovations: New compressors, fans and heat exchangers designed for high pressures and leak minimisation.
- Safety features: Leak detectors, automatic shut‑offs, explosion‑proof electrical components.
- Charge limitations: Development of equipment with minimal refrigerant charge to maximise safety.
Practice and experience from the Czech industry
- Manufacturers and distributors in the Czech Republic (e.g., Sinop CB, Embraco) already regularly implement natural refrigerants in household appliances, commercial display cases and heat pumps.
- Testing and certification: Each unit must undergo leak, safety and performance tests.
- Operational requirements: Regular inspections, charge records, employee training.
Czech Republic 
WITHOUT SHIPPING 
Other container news...
What Is a Shipping Container? The Ultimate Definitive Guide
A shipping container is a standardized, reusable steel box engineered to transport goods safely across multiple modes of transportation — ship, rail, and truck — without ever unloading the cargo inside. Also known as an ISO container, intermodal container, freight container, cargo container, sea van, dry box, or conex box, the shipping container is the invisible backbone of the global economy. More than 90% of everything you buy — from the smartphone in your pocket to the coffee in your cup — spent at least part of its journey inside one of these rectangular steel boxes.
Used Shipping Container: Grades, Costs, Inspection & More
A used shipping container delivers the same structural steel integrity as a new unit at 30–50% lower cost. For most storage, farming, job-site, and budget conversion applications, the right used container — properly graded and inspected — provides equal functional value with meaningfully lower upfront investment. This guide covers every decision you’ll face: grades, pricing, inspection, delivery, lifespan, and the mistakes that cost buyers thousands.
40ft Open Side Container
A 40ft open side container is a specialized ISO shipping container in which one full 40-foot long wall is replaced with bi-fold or multi-panel doors that swing open to provide unobstructed access along the entire side of the unit. Unlike a standard shipping container — where the only way in is through the 7-foot-8-inch-wide double doors at one end — an open side container lets you reach every pallet, every piece of equipment, and every inch of stored cargo from the side, without ever having to dig through layers of inventory. The standard end doors remain intact, giving you two fundamentally different access modes in a single unit.
20 Foot shipping container
A 20 foot shipping container is the single most important unit of measurement in global trade. It is the backbone of intermodal logistics, the standard by which every container ship, port terminal, and freight rate is measured, and — increasingly — a building block for homes, offices, and creative architecture. Despite its ubiquity, most people who encounter a 20 foot shipping container know surprisingly little about what defines it, how it came to be, and what it can actually do.